The Argument
In the realm of Egyptology, where ancient mysteries and alternative theories converge, one event stands out—the encounter between the formidable Egyptologist Dr. Zahi Hawass and the controversial alternative historian Graham Hancock. The clash took place at the Mena House Hotel in Giza, Egypt, on April 22, 2015, billed as the "first open debate between the representatives of two completely different versions of history." This blog unravels the drama that unfolded and the underlying tensions that led to the fiery exchange. Let's watch Zahi's tantrum first:
The Theory That Set Off The Argument
At the heart of the disagreement lies the Orion Correlation Theory, a fringe theory in Egyptology attempting to explain the arrangement of the Giza pyramid complex. Proposed by Robert Bauval, an Egyptian-born Belgian author and researcher, the theory suggests a deliberate correlation between the layout of the three main pyramids and Orion's Belt in the constellation Orion. Bauval's work, often characterized by his multidisciplinary approach, explores the interconnections between ancient Egyptian architecture, astronomy, and mythology. The Orion Correlation Theory delves into the ancient Egyptian association of Orion with Osiris, the god of rebirth and afterlife, positing that the alignment of the pyramids reflects a symbolic representation of cosmic and religious significance.
The Constellation of Orion (left) and a diagram of the Orion's Constellation Theory (right)
Why was Zahi Hawass so angry?
As Hancock prepared for his opening presentation, a photograph of Robert Bauval, the originator of the Orion Correlation Theory, appeared on one of his slides. This triggered an explosive reaction from Dr. Hawass, who vehemently demanded the removal of all references to Bauval and the theory. This heated exchange is captured in the video, offering a glimpse into the intensity of the moment.
Zahi Hawass and Barack Obama (left), Orion Constellation Theory (middle), Robert Bauval (right)
Picture presented by Graham Hancock during a conference. This is the picture that made Zahi Hawass furious and started the argument with Graham Hancock.
Negotiations Behind the Scenes with Zahi Hawass
Frantic negotiations occurred off-stage as the audience began to arrive. Dr. Hawass, refusing to engage in any debate with Hancock, finally agreed to return and give his talk. However, he insisted on not hearing or seeing Hancock's presentation. This led to a unique situation where Hancock spoke to the audience while Dr. Hawass sat in a room outside the conference hall.
Book by Robert Bauval: The Orion Mystery: Unlocking the Secrets of the Pyramids
The 2nd humilliating moment for Zahi Hawass
During the Q&A session, a question about the 11,600-year-old megalithic site of Gobekli Tepe was posed to Dr. Hawass. Surprisingly, Hawass seemed unaware of Gobekli Tepe's existence, a site that challenges conventional timelines. The question was passed to the moderator, Dr. Miroslav Barta, whose response highlighted a lack of comprehensive knowledge about Gobekli Tepe. Here's the video:
The clash between Zahi Hawass and Graham Hancock at the Mena House Hotel is a remarkable episode in the ongoing dialogue between mainstream Egyptology and alternative historical perspectives. It underscores the challenges and controversies inherent in exploring ancient mysteries and rewriting the narratives of our past. In the ever-evolving landscape of historical exploration, clashes like these fuel discussions, encouraging a deeper examination of our collective history and the enigmatic remnants left by ancient civilizations.
Graham Hancock's Response
Hancock's reaction, encapsulated in this video, remains a poignant representation of his unwavering dedication to questioning conventional wisdom and delving into the mysteries of our collective past.
Click on the link to shop Egyptian t-shirts and tank tops
